A•FOOD SUPPLY
SHOCK TOWER
CASE NOTE 01  /  SEPTEMBER 2026 SOURCES

FOOD SUPPLY SHOCK TOWER / CASE 01: AVOCADOS

What if my avocado supply breaks?

I've worked in sourcing. I'm also a college student tired of grocery price jumps. Avocados are my first food supply shock case: could a buyer cover a disruption before I need to switch?

MEXICO SHARE OF IMPORTS · 2025—USDA ERS [2]
WINTER / SPRING MEXICO SHARE · 2024—January–April U.S. imports · USDA ERS [2]
ANNUAL REPLACEMENT GAP · 2024—extreme assumption, not a shortage forecast [2, 3]
Test a disruption

THE VISION Spot supply shocks and know when to switch foods. NEXT · PLANNED: potatoes · chicken · broccoli · apples · blueberries · lettuce

01 / AVOCADO SOURCING DECISION

Keep Mexico. Qualify alternatives by week.

2025 U.S. IMPORT VOLUME—fresh avocados · USDA ERS [2]
MEXICO SHARE OF 2025 IMPORTS—by weight · USDA ERS [2]
2024 CURRENT-SUPPLIER CEILING GAP—even at 100% diversion · conditional [2, 3]
CORE LANE · OBSERVED

Mexico

—

2025 U.S. imports · protect continuity.

UNVERIFIED · Contingency volume
SUMMER OPTION · OBSERVED

Peru

—

2025 U.S. imports · peak —.

UNVERIFIED · Weekly size and free volume
BROADER OPTION · OBSERVED

Colombia

—

2025 U.S. imports · peak —.

UNVERIFIED · Contract and grade

U.S. receipt windows, not free supply · USDA ERS [2]

ANALYST INFERENCE

— Mexico share in Jan–Apr 2024. Peru peaks in summer; winter needs a separate contingency. [2]

02 / EVIDENCE

Follow the volume.

FIG 01 · REPORTED EXPORT RELATIONSHIPS

Alternative fruit already has buyers

Select a ribbon to inspect reported tonnes.

2024 reporter exports, not routes or spare capacity. The Netherlands may re-export. [3]

FIG 02 · OBSERVED EXPORT POOL

U.S. vs other buyers

U.S.Other buyers

Already traded, not spare capacity · FAOSTAT [3]

FIG 03 · RETAIL SELLING PRICE

Average per fruit

Annual $/unit · HAB/Circana [12]

FIG 04 · ORIGIN CONCENTRATION

Mexico's share of U.S. imports

Import tonnes · USDA ERS [2]

FIG 05 · SEASONAL ORIGIN MIX

Alternatives arrive unevenly

MexicoPeruOther

Monthly import tonnes · USDA ERS [2]

FIG 06 · PRICE AT THE BORDER

Customs value, not shelf price

Annual import $/kg · USDA ERS [2]

Price and disruption context 2022 · 2024 · 2025/26
EVENT ANNOTATIONSDescriptive context; no event effect estimated
2022 / CROP + INSPECTION

Prices rose before the pause

January shipping-point Hass cartons: $48.94 vs $23.05 a year earlier. Mexico's crop was forecast 8% lower; the inspection pause came February 12–18. [11]

2024 / SIZE MIX

More units, higher retail ASP

Retail units rose 4% and annual ASP rose 12% to $1.19 per fruit. Large fruit was scarcer; a June inspection pause also occurred. Neither effect is isolated. [12–14]

2025/26 / RECOVERY

Large fruit returned

Large-size share rose from 40% to 50% of Mexico's season-to-date U.S. shipments. Mid-March 2026 FOB was near $1/lb, about one-third of a year earlier. [8]

03 / SCENARIO

How large is the service gap?

Change assumptions. Results are import-equivalent tonnes. Method ↗

Flex and buffer are assumptions, not verified capacity.

CONDITIONAL REPLACEMENT GAP—SCENARIO · NOT A STORE SHORTAGE FORECAST

— of reference imports. Replace with retailer POS and contracts.

Mexico flow lost—
Assumed other-origin flex—
Assumed usable buffer—
Residual gap—

Loading monthly source baseline…

FIG 07 · SCENARIO SENSITIVITY

Which assumptions close the gap?

Gap as a share of baseline imports. Click to set extra flow and buffer.

Extra non-Mexico flow →
Model formula and limits

Lost Mexico flow = observed monthly Mexico tonnes ÷ days in month × 7 × weeks × loss share; subtract assumed extra non-Mexico flow and one-time buffer, floored at zero. An eight-week run repeats the selected month's rate. This is a stress test, not a calendar or price forecast. [2]

04 / SOURCING RESPONSE

What I would do as the buyer.

  1. 01 / PROTECT

    Protect Mexico. Confirm crossings, packhouses, and usable inventory. Observed concentration · retailer plan unverified

  2. 02 / QUALIFY

    Buy seasonal options. Trial Peru and Colombia by week, size, grade, and pack. Observed timing · capacity unverified

  3. 03 / TRIGGER

    Adjust promotions before stockouts. Tie decisions to confirmed receipts and DC inventory. Analyst recommendation · retailer data needed

Buyer execution needs POS and contracts. Grocery swaps need local prices and availability; neither is modeled here.

THE BROADER VISIONFrom one food to my daily dietOPEN ↗

I want one place to see whether the foods I eat every week are becoming harder or more expensive to source—and whether a practical substitute is available before a shock reaches the shelf.

  1. Watch: dated retail prices and availability alongside production, origin mix, seasonality, and disruption events.
  2. Explain: trace each signal to its source and test what a lost supply lane would mean under stated assumptions.
  3. Decide: compare local price, stock, and substitute cost before choosing to buy, wait, or switch foods.

Avocados are the first sourcing case. Cross-food comparisons, local shelf feeds, and swap alerts are planned, not live features.

SUPPLIER DILIGENCESix questions before counting replacement supplyOPEN ↗

BEFORE COUNTING REPLACEMENT SUPPLY

What I would ask a supplier tomorrow.

Historic shipments prove a lane existed. These answers determine whether it can cover a specific retail order.

  1. Which weeks and firm tonnes can you commit beyond existing customer contracts?
  2. Which Hass sizes, grades, ripeness specs, and bag or bulk packs can you supply?
  3. What are packhouse throughput, cold-chain capacity, lead time, and route variance?
  4. What U.S. phytosanitary requirements apply to this fruit and origin?
  5. What is the delivered cost by SKU, including shrink and claims?
  6. What happens to the commitment if inspection or freight is interrupted?

STATUS · UNVERIFIED COMMERCIAL INPUTS. None is inferred from national production or bilateral exports.

DATA APPENDIXExplore the source data, global context, and methodsOPEN ↗

THE SYSTEM / EXPLORE

From orchards to market

Annual production and trade · Monthly U.S. imports
2024 comparison year

Country shading represents production volume. Select a country to inspect it.

01 / THE DEPENDENCY

— of U.S. imports came from Mexico. Its supply was about — times the shipments from every other origin combined.

GLOBAL DESK / 2024 OBSERVED DATA

The world market at a glance.

Production is where fruit was grown. Trade rows are exporter-reported bilateral sales, including possible re-exports. They are relationships between countries, not shipment routes or uncommitted supply. [1, 3]

WORLD HARVEST · 2024—metric tonnes
CHANGE SINCE 2015—world production
REPORTING PRODUCERS—with a 2024 observation
MEXICO'S WORLD SHARE—2024 production
01 / WORLD OUTPUT

A decade of growth

FAOSTAT avocado production, 2015–2024. Hover or focus a year for its reported total.

Metric tonnes; all avocado varieties. [1]

02 / TRADE RELATIONSHIPS

The busiest reported lanes

Largest 2024 exporter-to-partner records in the FAOSTAT snapshot.

Reported partner flows, not physical routes; transit and re-export may be involved. [3]

03 / BUYER MARKETS

Where exports are reported

Top destinations summed across exporter-reported partner rows, 2024.

These totals are not final consumption. The Netherlands, for example, also reports avocado exports. [3]

02 / PRODUCTIONFAOSTAT ↗

Growing avocados does not make a country a substitute.

Output includes domestic use and fruit already committed to other markets. The largest growers are not necessarily the largest suppliers to the U.S.

FAOSTAT production, tonnes, 2024. Countries only; world total includes smaller producers.

03 / TIMINGUSDA ERS ↗

Alternative origins arrive on a different calendar.

Monthly shipments reveal where a supplier is already active. Historical timing is evidence of market presence, not a guarantee of spare capacity.

MONTHLY U.S. IMPORTS
Mexico Peru Other

USDA ERS fresh-avocado import volume. Calendar months of selected year.

THE ANALYST'S READ / THREE TESTS

How exposed is the system?

Each measure answers a different question. Keep the denominator and the year in view.

01 / IMPORT RELIANCE—

of U.S. fresh-avocado availability came from imports in 2024.

USDA ERS yearbook estimate. This is a share of domestic availability; the Mexico share above is a share of imports. [5]

02 / ORIGIN CONCENTRATION—

of 2025 U.S. fresh-avocado imports came from Mexico.

Compare annual origin shares, 2017–2025. The 2024 scenario remains fixed to the latest common year with the FAOSTAT trade matrix. [2]

03 / CALENDAR EXPOSURE

Risk is highest when alternative lanes are thinnest.

Loading monthly comparison…

U.S. imports by recorded origin and calendar month, 2024. Shares are observed; bars do not represent spare capacity. [2]

SUPPLIER OPTIONS / OBSERVED FLOWS

Which alternatives can help—and when?

These are sourcing candidates, not a ranked capacity forecast. U.S. lane sizes come from 2025 imports; non-U.S. export volumes and destinations use 2024 reporter data. [2, 3]

DOMESTIC BUFFER

California

Domestic shipments rise in spring and peak in summer, according to USDA ERS. They can complement summer imports, but are not part of this import-reallocation model. [8]

DEVELOPMENT PATH

Guatemala

APHIS updated the systems-approach requirements for Hass avocados in 2025, including a joint operational workplan and pest controls. ERS records no U.S. import flow in this snapshot for 2024–25; this is a qualification prospect, not modeled replacement volume. [9]

Peak three-month windows are descriptive shares of each origin’s 2025 U.S. shipments. A destination such as the Netherlands is the reported trade partner, not necessarily the final consumer or physical route. The Dominican Republic’s U.S. supply is predominantly non-Hass, so product fit requires separate assessment. [8]

AT THE RETAIL EDGE / PRICE EVIDENCE

What shoppers see—and what they pay.

Retail prices sit downstream of import costs. These two USDA measures capture different parts of that market and use different units.

WEEKLY ADVERTISED PRICE · CONVENTIONAL HASS · EACH—

National grocery-store promotions · report loading

Advertised prices are promotional offers, not transaction-weighted checkout averages. [6]

SCANNER-DATA RETAIL ESTIMATE · 2023 · PER POUND—

USDA ERS estimate of the average price paid for fresh avocados in 2023, based on Circana retail scanner data. [7]

Two lenses, two units.

One is a weekly advertised price per fruit; the other is an annual transaction-based estimate per pound. The Atlas does not subtract them or feed either into its import-cost scenario.

RETAIL FORMAT / THE HIDDEN CAPACITY TEST

The fruit must fit the shelf.

A sourcing plan must specify pack format and fruit size as well as origin. The Hass Avocado Board's Circana analysis shows why this matters. [10]

U.S. RETAIL AVOCADO UNITSBAGGED SHARE · 2019–2022
201919.0%
202022.9%
202128.4%
202228.4%
Bagged fruitBulk fruit

Circana multi-outlet scanner sales reported by HAB. Share is measured in individual avocado units, including fruit inside bags—not the number of bags. Calendar years 2019–2022; historical context, not a 2026 market-share estimate. [10]

THE 2022 FORMAT SIGNAL+9.4 points

Bagged fruit's share rose from 19.0% in 2019 to 28.4% in 2022. Small 4- and 5-count bags generated 54% of bagged avocado dollar sales in 2022. [10]

BUYER'S TEST

Ask prospective suppliers for packhouse throughput by bag count and fruit size, packaging materials, ripening specifications, and delivered cost by SKU. Tonnes alone cannot confirm a retail-ready replacement.

04 / DISRUPTION TEST

Remove Mexico.
What can move instead?

Start with the volume the U.S. imported from Mexico in 2024. Then ask how much of other suppliers’ exports to non-U.S. markets might be redirected. This is a one-year allocation thought experiment, not a forecast.

MEXICO → U.S.
20%

Assumption, not observed free capacity. Only origins with observed 2024 U.S. imports are included. Try 100% to test the conditional ceiling.

30%

Applied to the 2024 U.S. average import unit value. It is not a retail-price or market-clearing forecast.

MODELED / ANNUALBASELINE
—tonnes remain uncovered

Conditional import-equivalent gap under selected assumptions. This is not a forecast of U.S. shortage.

— redirected— lost
EXTREME ANNUAL REPLACEMENT TEST · 100% DIVERSION—

Conditional replacement gap within the current U.S. supplier set. Existing buyers would lose every redirected tonne.

ILLUSTRATIVE EXTRA IMPORT BILL—

For the redirected volume only; excludes price changes on existing imports and domestic supply.

NEXT CONSTRAINT

The next bottleneck is not where avocados grow. It is how much existing export supply can be diverted, in season, through U.S.-accessible channels.

OBSERVED 2024 ENTRY PATTERN86% through the Laredo customs district · 6% Philadelphia · 5% Miami [4]District shares describe recorded entry, not available spare capacity or exact shipment routes.

RISK REGISTER / EVIDENCE TO ACTION

Where the chain could fail.

Risk signals are observed. The responses are analyst recommendations to validate with suppliers, buyers, and import authorities.

01 / ORIGIN & ENTRY

One supplier, one major entry corridor

Mexico supplied 83.4% of 2025 import volume. In 2024, 86% of fresh avocado imports entered through the Laredo customs district. These are separate measures, both pointing to concentrated exposure. [2, 4]

Decision

Map alternate entry arrangements and test continuity plans with existing Mexican partners before a disruption.

02 / CALENDAR FIT

Alternatives peak after winter exposure

Mexico supplied 95.2% of U.S. imports in January–April 2024. Peru’s 2025 U.S. shipments peaked in June–August. A large annual export pool cannot automatically cover a winter shortfall. [2, 8]

Decision

Contract and test supply by month, size, and grade; measure the gap for the exact weeks that matter.

03 / COMPETING BUYERS

Export volume is already allocated

Peru and Colombia sell substantial volume outside the U.S.; USDA ERS reports that more than half of their fresh exports go to the EU. The 2024 FAOSTAT diversion pool is a stress-test ceiling, not free stock. [3, 8]

Decision

Verify contracts, packhouse throughput, and the economics of shifting fruit from existing customers.

04 / PRODUCT & ACCESS

“Avocado” is not one interchangeable SKU

USDA reports that most non-Hass U.S. imports come from the Dominican Republic. APHIS requirements also depend on origin and product; Guatemala’s Hass pathway has specific pest-control conditions. [8, 9]

Decision

Check cultivar, size, ripeness program, phytosanitary status, and current ACIR conditions before qualifying an origin.

FIVE-MINUTE BRIEFING

Follow the shock through the chain.

01 / 04

The world grows 11.2 million tonnes.

Production is widespread, but U.S. imports are concentrated in one origin.

METHOD & LIMITS

What these numbers can—and cannot—say.

Observed: FAOSTAT annual production and bilateral exports; USDA ERS monthly U.S. fresh-avocado imports. All physical quantities are normalized to metric tonnes. USDA values are customs import values, not shelf prices.

Short-horizon tabletop: February or July 2025 USDA ERS monthly import tonnes are converted to a weekly rate by dividing by days in the month and multiplying by seven. Lost Mexican flow is reduced by an assumed uplift on observed non-Mexican imports and a one-time buffer measured as days of normal Mexican flow. The selected month is repeated for the chosen weeks; alternatives and buffer are hypothetical, not available capacity or verified store inventory.

Annual tail test: The separate Mexico-zero scenario holds 2024 U.S. import requirements fixed and reallocates a chosen fraction of other suppliers’ reported exports to non-U.S. markets. It assumes no first-year production growth, substitution, inventory drawdown, or logistics expansion.

Important limit: FAOSTAT “Avocados” is not a variety-specific match to USDA’s fresh-avocado series. Export and import reporters differ in timing and coverage. Annual exports do not establish monthly availability, quality, route, contractual freedom, or U.S. approval. The premium control illustrates arithmetic; historical data here cannot identify a causal price response.

Reconciliation and data quality +

Loading reconciliation…

SOURCE LEDGER

Every major fact has a trail.

  1. 01 / PRODUCTIONFAOSTAT, Crops and livestock products ↗

    Item 572, Avocados; element Production; 2024 and historical annual observations.

  2. 02 / U.S. IMPORTSUSDA ERS, Fruit and Tree Nuts Trade Data ↗

    Fresh avocados, monthly country-of-origin volume and value, 2017–2025. Download updated September 15, 2026.

  3. 03 / GLOBAL TRADEFAOSTAT, Detailed trade matrix ↗

    Item 572, reporter exports by partner, 2024. Bilateral trade relationships, not physical shipment routes.

  4. 04 / LOGISTICS CONTEXTUSDA ERS, Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook, March 2025 ↗

    Reports 2024 entry through Laredo, Philadelphia and Miami customs districts. Districts are not exact ports or shipment trajectories.

  5. 05 / U.S. AVAILABILITYUSDA ERS, Fruit and Tree Nuts Yearbook, Table H-1 ↗

    Fresh avocado import share of U.S. domestic availability, calendar 2024; updated February 10, 2026. This is a USDA balance-sheet estimate.

  6. 06 / ADVERTISED RETAILUSDA AMS, Weekly Grocery Store Specialty Crops ↗

    National conventional Hass, each; September 25, 2026 report. Major grocery retailer promotions, not a checkout price.

  7. 07 / SCANNER RETAILUSDA ERS, Fruit and Vegetable Prices ↗

    Fresh avocado average retail price per pound, 2023 Circana scanner-data estimate.

  8. 08 / 2026 MARKET OUTLOOKUSDA ERS, Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook, March 2026 ↗

    2025 import record, origin mix, seasonality, California and competing export markets; report dated March 26, 2026.

  9. 09 / MARKET ACCESSUSDA APHIS, Guatemala Hass import requirements ↗

    April 2025 update to pest-control and operational-workplan requirements. Check current ACIR conditions before procurement.

  10. 10 / RETAIL FORMATHass Avocado Board, Rethinking Retail: Bagged Avocados ↗

    Circana multi-outlet retail sales, 2019–2022. Bagged share uses individual fruit units, including avocados sold inside bags; 2022 pack-size mix uses dollar sales. Historic format evidence, not a current-year estimate.

  11. 11 / 2022 DISRUPTIONUSDA ERS, Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook, March 2022 ↗

    Mexico crop outlook, January import change, shipping-point carton prices, and February 12–18 inspection suspension. Shipping-point prices are not retail checkout prices.

  12. 12 / RETAIL PRICE SERIESHass Avocado Board, Total U.S. 2024 Q4 Retail Composite ↗

    Circana multi-outlet annual avocado category average selling price per unit, 2022–2024; this is sales dollars divided by fruit units.

  13. 13 / SIZE-MIX CONTEXTHass Avocado Board, 2024 Year in Review ↗

    Industry account of 2024 smaller fruit mix and large-size retail unit declines. Contextual evidence, not an identified cause of retail price change.

  14. 14 / 2024 INSPECTION PAUSEUSDA ERS, Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook, July 2024 ↗

    Documents a brief June 2024 inspection suspension for avocado and mango shipments from Michoacán due to inspector safety concerns. It does not estimate the avocado retail-price effect.

Boundaries: Natural Earth public-domain 1:110m countries. Data accessed September 26, 2026.